Le ragioni delle regole per la valutazione dell'Università: per un'etica della pratica accademica

digital

Articolo

rivista	STUDI DI SOCIOLOGIA
fascicolo	STUDI DI SOCIOLOGIA - 2011 - 1
titolo	Le ragioni delle regole per la valutazione dell'Università: per un'etica della pratica accademica
Autori	Mauro Palumbo, Carlo Pennisi
Editore	Vita e Pensiero
formato	Articolo \| Pdf
online da	01-2011
issn	0039-291X (stampa) \| 1827-7896 (digitale)

€ 6,00

Ebook in formato Pdf leggibile su questi device:

Computer
con Software:
- Adobe PDF Reader
Android
iPhone/Ipad
con App:
- Adobe PDF Reader
E-Book Reader
Ibs Tolino
Kobo

Descrizione
M. PALUMBO - C. PENNISI, Reasons for University evalutation: ethical and deontological issues The necessity of University evaluation derives from ethical and deontological issues, linked to the autonomy that is a necessary feature of the University, since its foundations. Nevertheless, it is not «the University» as a whole to be evaluated, but those specific components and activities, in which the scientific interests of professors must be coherent with the interests of other stakeholders (students, colleagues, public institutions, society) by clearly defined rules and objectives. Evaluation is strongly tied to autonomy, by means of the accountability that every autonomous institutions must warrant. Unfortunately, the recent University reform law does not propose evaluation as an instrument of accountability and as a tool to make Universities responsible, but as an instrument of their external control. Key words: Academic evaluation, Universities evaluation, University reform, Institutional change.

Descrizione

M. PALUMBO - C. PENNISI, Reasons for University evalutation: ethical and deontological issues
The necessity of University evaluation derives from ethical and deontological issues, linked to the autonomy that is a necessary feature of the University, since its foundations. Nevertheless, it is not «the University» as a whole to be evaluated, but those specific components and activities, in which the scientific interests of professors must be coherent with the interests of other stakeholders (students, colleagues, public institutions, society) by clearly defined rules and objectives. Evaluation is strongly tied to autonomy, by means of the accountability that every autonomous institutions must warrant. Unfortunately, the recent University reform law does not propose evaluation as an instrument of accountability and as a tool to make Universities responsible, but as an instrument of their external control.
Key words: Academic evaluation, Universities evaluation, University reform, Institutional change.